Recap:#1. "Of the Holy Spirit" is in the "adjectival" genitive case and not the case of "identification" or apposition. There is a consistent Biblical use of the "adjectival genitive" when a Person is in the relationship. The Holy Spirit is a Person of the Godhead. He's the giver and not the gift. Hebrews 6:4 also helps by differentiating for us Heaven's gift from the association of the Holy Spirit. #2. Peter's requirement of "shall take the gift of the Holy Spirit" (Acts 2:38) is surely what the audience took; i.e., they "gladly took his word." Either that is true or they failed in obeying this instruction. # 3. Ephesians 2:8 calls the common salvation (Jude 1:3) "the faith" through which is the source of "the gift of God." This corroborates the interpretation of number 1. # 4. We then substantiated the interpretation of the promise mentioned in Acts 2:39 with the “promise” of universal blessing through Abraham: "That upon the Gentiles might come the blessing of Abraham in Christ Jesus; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through the faith" (δια της πιστεωςG4102, Galatians 3:14; fulfilment of Genesis 12:1-4).
Now we look at Jesus' predicted requirement of entrance into the Kingdom according to John 3:3-8.
The Kingdom of Christ. When
the apostles delivered
the first public announcement ( ἐπαγγελἱαG1860, verse 2:39) of the gospel after
Jesus ascended into
Heaven, the Holy Spirit
stipulated (1) qualification for forgiveness of sins and (2) requirement to receive
the gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38). The
passage says Peter said it, but remember that the apostles were
speaking as the Holy Spirit gave them utterance (2:4). Just before
the Lord ascended into Heaven, the kingdom was yet to be established
(Acts 1:3, 6). After Pentecost, the preaching of Jesus meant the
preaching of His Kingdom
(Acts 8:12). “For
the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and
peace and joy in the Holy Spirit”
(Romans
14:17). So,
those obeying Peter's
preaching on
that
Pentecost
were translated
into Christ's
Kingdom (2:41; Colossians
1:13).
That
is, they entered into righteousness, peace, and joy in
the
Holy Spirit. Was this not a tremendous gift of the Holy Spirit?
The
Spirit further stated that the promise given on Pentecost was not
only for the immediate audience but for whomever God would call.
Whatever Acts 2:38 meant to those that day must be interpreted as
applying to us who are called by the gospel even today (2
Thessalonians 2:13, 14). No exception.
When
we talk about the Holy Spirit's gift and the beginning of the Kingdom
of Christ, we must not forget that Jesus called the Kingdom's
entrance requirement a new birth (John 3:3). Jesus had
explained to Nicodemus, “Verily, verily, I say unto thee,
Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into
the kingdom of God” (John 3:5; cf. v. 8). The new birth
then is the Kingdom's entrance requirement.
The Gift
of the Holy Spirit and the New Birth. Peter announces in verse 30 that God predicted He would raise Jesus from the dead
to sit on the throne. If Christ's reign (Kingdom)
exists on Pentecost and it can be proven that it did, then the
ones entering it (Acts 2:41) would have had to have been born again,
according to Jesus to Nicodemnu. Would it be odd if Peter says nothing
about how to enter the Kingdom. I.e., Would we not expect Peter to reveal
to the audience how they were to enter Christ's Kingdom.
They did two things: (1) received the Word and
(2) were
baptized. Both actions
were subsequent to the baptism of the Holy Spirit upon the apostles
through whom the Spirit
spoke. Their action was based on the Spirit's invitation. Is it not their gift promised to them by the Holy Spirit?
The
Holy Spirit predicted
through the
prophet Joel
about
the baptism of the Holy Spirit, but
the
same
Spirit
also
interpreted
through the
apostlesthat
the prophecy had been fulfilled in them prior to the audience
congregating.i
The baptism of the Holy Spirit is not the new birth. Neither is it
the gift that the audience was to take.
The
Command to Receive. When the audience asked the
apostles what to do, Peter commanded them to [1]“Repent ye,
and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ unto the
remission of your sins; and”[2]
“ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit”
(2:38, ASV). It is easy to see that repentance and being baptized
are commanded, but we should likewise consider the implication of the
clause “ye shall receive the gift of
the Holy Spirit”.ii
Some teachers treat the clause as being passive because of the
connotation of the English word “receive.” That is, “the
obedient are to sit and wait to receive something.” Not
so. God saves the baptized believer (Mark 16:15,16). That act is
God's and is in the passive voice. But not so in this declaration by
the Holy Spirit through Peter.iii
He/she must physically take
this gift.
The
Spirit gave the gift through the apostles. The subject
is not just a “receiver” of the gift but he is to be a
“taker.” One who grasps the gift. It has been pointed out that the verb “receive”
in this passage is a future middle voice verb.iv
It should be considered as an active verb. That means the
receiver is to be active in taking
the gift. The
future
active
is
like a command; illustrated
bysuch
passages,
as James
2:8, “You
shall
LOVE
your neighbor as yourself"vand
Matthew 1:21, “You
shallcall
His
name Jesus.”vi
The
Tangible Gift. We should not spend our time
passively “waiting” for a miracle to happen upon us (or in us) in our lives.
Those on Pentecost didn't. Second, neither should we ignore this
requirement of getting the gift of the Holy Spirit. Third, it is a
tangible “thing” that we can take. Something that the
audience could understand as being a result of their acting.
Therefore, the Pentecostal audience should demonstrate to us what it
is, in the inspired text. It so happens, we are told what they did.
The
Gift of the Word and
Entrance.
What
did the audience do? What demonstration
is
for us so that we can
imitate their actions? “Then
they that gladly
received [also
middle]
his wordwere
baptized: and the same day there were
added unto them
[entrance
into
the kingdom]
about three thousand souls”
(Acts 2:41, 47).
They
receivedvii
his Word. They
are enthusiastic in responding.
That
is, they took “fully
his Word.”
From whence
was his
(Peter's)
Word? Was it not that given by the Holy Spirit who gave the
apostles' “utterance.”viiiIs
this message not a gift then
from
the Holy Spirit? Also,
is
it not part
of what
makes us born
again (John
3:3,5)?
The
Seed
for One's
New
Birth.
“Since
you have been
born again,
not of perishable seed but of imperishable, through the living and
abiding word
of God”
(1 Peter 1:23, ESV).
“Having
been begotten again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible,
through the
word of God,
which liveth and abideth”
(1 Peter 1:22-23). The
responders became
new creations. “He
chose to give us birth through the word of truth, that we might be a
kind of firstfruits of all he created”
(James 1:18, NIV).
Receiving
the Word is part of
a of a soul being made
holy. Jesus
prayed in John 17:17, “Make
them holy
through thy
Truth. Thy [God's]
word is Truth.”
The
Lord's church,
His Kingdom,
is
said to be made by
Jesus “holy
by the power
ofHis
Word,
and he made it pure
by washing it with water”
(Ephesians 5:26, CEV).
Receiving the Word gave the 3000 the authority to be reborn as children of God. The apostle John equates the receiving to believing.
"But as many as received Him [the Word, John 1:1-3), He gave them the authority to become children of God, to those who believe in His name; who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God" (John 1:12, 13, English Majority Text Version).
Water
for New Birth.
The apostle John later says that Jesus included water in the Holy Spirit's new birth requirement for entrance into His Kingdom (John 3:3, 5). But how is water
involved in the new birth?
Is not this
done by baptism in
water? Receiving the Word is believing but it gives the believer authority to be a child of God. Obedient
baptism for the
new birth, is
in
water.
Cornelius'
household was baptized by the Holy Spirit before
they had heard the Word.
After hearing the Word, they were
commanded
to have themselves immersed
in water (Acts
10:47,48). Is
this
notthe
water
understood to be part of the new birth required by Jesus for entry
into His
kingdom (John
3:5-8)?
Notice:
“According
to His mercy He saved us, through the
washing of regenerationand
renewal of the Holy Spirit”
(Titus
3:5b,
MKJV). We
are
baptized
in water for
the washing of regeneration. When
one hears and believes the Word of God, he obeys the Word by
repenting
(as the Spirit directed), and is baptized
in water in the name of the Father, the Son, and
the Holy Spirit (Matthew
28:19-20). With
baptism in water (which is in the authority of all three, including the Holy Spirit, according to Jesus), the believer is put into the Lord’s body (1
Corinthians 12:13), which is the church (Colossians 1:18); i.e.,
the kingdom of God.
The
Future deponent middle
tense.The
“receiving” action is in the future tense. It can refer to a continuing blessing as it does in this case. Note
carefully that the future tense in
Greek does
not imply
the action takes place instantaneously. Rather we should say the
speaker conceives of the fact of the action without indicating at
all the continuity.ix
But a new
child
must grow. What
did the Jerusalem believers do after baptism? Did they not
continue
stedfastlyin
the apostles' teaching,
fellowship, breaking of bread and prayers? “Stedfastly”
according to Strong's
Greek Dictionary is “to
be earnest towards,
that is, (to a thing) to persevere, be constantly diligent, or (in a
place) to attend
assiduously all the
exercises, or (to a person) to adhere closely to (as a servitor).” One is nurtured by
the Holy Spirit's gift as time goes on.
Continued
Stedfastly in Receiving
the Gift. They
were in
earnest towardstheir
new birth.
“That
like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the
Father, even so we
also should walk
in newness of life”
(Romans 6:4). The
gift of the Holy Spirit
is the
“newness
of life.”
Definitely we
are to actively take
this new life. “And
that ye put
on the new
man,
which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness”
(Ephesians
4:24; cf.
Colossians 3:10).
“Therefore
if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature”
(2 Corinthians 5:17).
We
are responsible to walk in accordance with our gift of new life.
“And
be
not intoxicated with wine in which is carnality! But
be filled
in spirit!”
(Ephesians 5:18,x
ABP+).
We are not to feed
our flesh in
drunkenness but “fill
our
spirit.” We
are to fill our life with the Spirit's
word.xi
“As newborn
babes, desire
the sincere milk
of the word, that ye may grow thereby”
(1 Peter 2:2,3). Believers
are to take our newly
sanctifiedxii
spirit and “grow
in
grace and knowledge”
(2 Peter 3:18).
Our
Target. Finally,
our goal in receiving the Holy Spirit's gift is to bear fruit. Just
as “gift” in Acts 2:38 is singular,
so is the word fruit
singular but
multi-faceted.
We are to walk in the Spirit (Galatians 5:16,18) and bear love,
joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness,
temperance (verse 23). The fruit of our gift MUST include all of
these or else our fruit would be considered "defective".
Conclusion. Jesus
sent the Holy Spirit to guide the apostles in preaching of the
Kingdom and telling people how to enter the Kingdom. As Jesus told the learned Pharisee, Nicodemnus, "[Jesus answered,] Verily, verily,
I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God" (John 3:3,5).
In verse 5, Jesus
tells Nicodemus that one must be born again from above. Jesus explained to Nicodemus that the new required birth was of water and the Spirit.
When the Spirit came to the apostles on the day of Pentecost in Acts 2, He further explains this mystery of entrance into Christ's Kingdom.
For Peter explains that
Jesus is now on the throne of David (Acts 2:30) to Jerusalem's audience. If being
born from above qualifies us to enter and be added to Christ's
Kingdom, then obviously Peter would be explaining this. Yet what he explains is the requirement of
taking the gift of the Holy Spirit in Acts 2:38. When we follow Peter's steps of salvation,
are we not also taking the Holy Spirit's
precious announced gift of entrance into the Kingdom of Christ. For as Paul explains if in the church one
is in the Kingdom (Colossians 1:13). We have the same Spirit's prophecy delivered miraculously through the apostles in Jerusalem.
But we have it written
as Scripture. When we obey the Spirit's Scripture, would we not be blessed with the same gift today
that the people in Jerusalem received through the
apostles. Scripture is the Spirit's gift to us. Shouldn't we need to take the Spirit's gift and be born from above.
Should we not then walk in the newness of
life from the Holy Spirit (Romans 6:1-6).
-
Gaylon West
Throw
Out the Lifeline
Other articles in this series, The Gift of the Holy Spirit:
http://BibleStudyLessons.net
i
Peter and the apostles are speaking as the Holy Spirit gives them
utterance (Acts 2:4). Later, the same Spirit confirmed through
Peter that the Gentiles had been been baptized as well (Acts 11:15).
ii
Future deponent middle is considered as future active; in Greek
'the future tense can also be used in the sense of a command ("You
shall call His name Jesus"- Matt. 1:21).'
http://www.angelfire.com/nt/theology/greekverbs.html.
iii
In 1 Cor. 6:11, the triad washed,
sanctified, justified,
the first term is middle while the last two are passive. The
sanctification and justification (passive)
are by God, as a
result of their getting themselves washed (middle).
Go to:
http://biblestudylessons.net/articles/8_27_15acts%202_38%20receive.html
iv
In the original Greek language “shall receive” is
future indicative middle and should be understood as an active
verb. http://www.ntgreek.net/lesson24.htm
v
http://www.angelfire.com/nt/theology/greekverbs.html.
Prior
to 1960, the English word “shall” was used as a
command when used in the second person (i.e., “you”).
The translators apparently understood the Greek to be a command and
followed the current grammar. “You shall receive.”
Literally, “you shall take.” This is like a
mother insisting, “You shall clean your room.” Hence,
you shall take(not
just
passively
receive) the
gift of the Holy Spirit.
The
workers in the parable of the vineyard were promised pay for work
(Matthew 12:7, “shall receive”) and subsequently when
they were hesitant were commanded to take the designated pay
(Matthew 12:12).
vii
[Aorist Participle Middle]. apodechomai G588
- - to take fully, that is, welcome (persons), approve
(things): - accept, receive (gladly).
viiiApophtheggomai.
To
enunciateplainly,
that is, declare:
- say, speak forth, utterance.
x
“And be not drunk with wine, in which is dissoluteness, but
be filled in the Spirit” (YLT, “the” is added).
xi
There is no “the” or “holy” in the Greek
passage. In order for Greek to definitely point to a person, esp.,
the Godhead, the Greek must have the definite article; e.g., the
God, the Father, the Son, the Jesus, the Holy Spirit. There is a
contrast of feeding our body and feeding our soul's spirit.
xiihagiazōG37;
Strong's, “to make holy, that is, (ceremonially) purify
or consecrate; ...- hallow, be holy, sanctify.”